I was just wondering that there must be many ways in which the future could go. If the world goes into singularity and all resources become non-scarce, then would we
even need currency?

say for instance if we all lived inside computers, connected to each other through p2p connection network called the internet9, lived somewhere you didn't have to pay
for your property, and did not have to worry about any physical existance because you have backups alll over the place and all your friends have a copy, and basically
no one has to worry about dieing.

where would the need for money arise? we will no longer need to borrow money for resources because, all resources including processed things would not cost you money
(everything is virtual or copyable in a similar way). so basically old information will not cost anything, it's just whatever you choose to adopt, (benefits others for
you to adopt cause then you can have a copy of their memory). Alright, and assuming bandwidth and all hardwarde limitations will not exist either (quantum entangled
particles, created universes etc). and then if our existance is not questioned either in terms of the universe ending or anything making us "immortal gods". as we
could create our own realites and even realities for others, (maybe universes too).

so basically, we will not have to do anything in a hurry, so time would not be a problem.

the point is i wanted to know if any of you could think of perhaps some examples of a necessty for money, in any form existing in such a world

here is an example i thought i had but it seems as if it's not necessary afterall:


i was thinking that perhaps we might want someones attention for a problem that we have. So the possible replies to a request for attention, is to give attention and
to not. the reasons why someone might give attention, are A because they find it interesting, or B you expect the repayment of a debt. I guess if there is an unlimited
amount of information, then a finite amount of people or finite amount of storage space, and it's even more doubtful you could store multiple copies.

with no institutions however there will not really be anyone to hold the money, or rather to enforce it's repayment. so the person being paid will have to trust the
money they are being given. the easiest way is to verify with the issuer of the money. I was thinking that perhaps the money could be issued from a group of people so
any of the members are liable to repay the debt, and just the one person that initiated the debt.

There is the problem however that you may initiate some debt, that was not approved by the group. that means you would have to verify with the "group". now what can
happen is that you could list a few other people that benefit from the purchase of knowledge creation that you are making, that would be willing to do x worth amount
of creative information for it. there should not be a problem of people stock piling a certain person then asking a lot of things at once from the same person as they
could just make a few copies of themselves to do the work, or work on these things in the "background". processor space really wont be an issue and it would be rare
that something would require all of your consciousness to do creative things, and when it is, i think by definition you'd find it interesting, and even in that case
you could create a copy of yourself that only lived to complete that mission if your really didn't want to, though you would by doing this give it the option of
actually killing itself. that's really the only thing you lose when you give out copies of yourselves, you risk them becoming more valuable than yourself. and then you
wouldn't be asked to do so many things, though your name might not be as weighty on such a list.

the question though is, what's stopping you from asking those people now. if they could just make a copy of themselves that would most likely die of depression once it
finishes whatever task you sent it out to do. most people probably wont mind making copies of themselves, and those that do, could have probably a large group of
people convince them to do it themselves if they bother them enough or what not (though you could always ignore them, you probably wont want to ignore all your
friends, unless they aren't friends that is). so even this form of creative money system is probably not necessary. perhaps it would exist in some earlier instance
where people can't just make instances of themselves whose sole purpose in life is to do the task assigned.